Clark's essay, briefly, in one sentence, goes over the religions that combine theology and empiricism. It is surprising how Clark just glances over this area where naturalism and supernaturalism are so beautifully combined. Faiths like Confucianism and Platonic theology call for the collection of knowledge. Confucianism isn't very other-worldly, as its focuses (or at least the book did) on human interactions and virtue. Plato focused on rational human thinking and despite all his spiritual thinking, his philosophy focused on human society and ethics.
Deism, as a basic pillar of the religion, believes in a rational God.
Buddhism, even with its spiritual elements of reincarnation, Buddha advocated personal mediation and enlightenment.
Regardless, Clark's essay is focused on creating a tolerant society. It wouldn't really be tolerant if everyone was forced into tolerant religions; that wouldn't be a viable solution. But it would still be an interesting point, like who ever heard of genocide committed in the name of Buddha?
No comments:
Post a Comment