In another order of science, robotics and prosthetics have come a long way, to the point where crippled human beings can replace missing limbs and digits with new artificial ones. However we still cannot create artificial limbs that are as flexible or dexterous as our natural limbs are. Still they will come a moment where the machine will surpass us in everywhere and robotic augments might only be available to those with money or influence.
On all of the above mentioned methods to control our own evolution, we have clearly separated us from natural selection, but we might be unleashing the beast within us if we explore our evolutionary potential when we as a race may not be able to control the rapid change. And like the biological evolution that preceded us, a new race of humans will have to compete with the old race. And that could be some class warfare that even Marx could foresee.
I do not think that continuing to pursue 'artificial evolution' is at all a bad idea; in fact, I think it is a very good one. While science-fiction novels and films frequently depict dystopian futures wherein 'normal' humans have to show that they have some kind of special quality that makes them better than 'enhanced' humans, in reality I think that taking advantage of technological enhancements would have relatively few negative effects. Of course, such advancements could very lead to a class divide, but that is a problem of capitalism rather than of the technology itself. In a socialist or communism society, the advancements would only be positive, and anyone who chose to could take advantage of them.
ReplyDeleteThis last point is why I prefer the idea of technological enhancements to eugenics - because enhancements are available to pre-existing people, rather than to a new generation. This would make them, I think, much more appealing to many people, because they do not make already-living people 'defunct.' This makes the idea much more practical, as it is more likely to garner mass support.
P.S. I also posted this on my blog if you'd rather read it there.